FORUM contact LINKS
UPDATES Legal Case Analysis
video interview 1


majestic session
 
 

Between Oct. and Dec. 2002


Text of Conference with biologist "George" regarding Dr. Dan Burisch and how Ganesh Particles work

This conference transcript was recently discovered and we have yet to research the details.
The full text of the conference is contained here. It appears to have taken place during the period of time when Dan had disappeared ..... and Bj was unsure if he was still alive.

The ID of the guest has been omitted, to protect his identity, and the other names in the chat have been changed to their real names.


The biologist in question seems to have been a fellow student and peer of Dan during his studies (1987-1989), presumably at SUNY in Stony Brook.

 

Biologist X: Okay, I have been provided with a copy of the so called Lotus Protocol and the 18 page document posted on BJ's site. I have some concerns about the protocols employed, but not because they appear wacked out, but because there appears to be multiple levels of protocols being employed simultaneously.

Throughout the work, this guy alludes to other forms and "pursuant to other protocols." I think we are dealing with paperwork that was never meant to hit the light of day. Certainly no self respecting peer reviewed journal would publish it, under current guidelines.

This doesnt mean that it doesn't make sense though, although I wish it made a little less sense as it is giving me some problems with cell origins theory.

His work appears to bear multiple logic levels and interdisciplinary ability on the level I figured he was bound, all those years ago.... Well, not if you take his theory into account. .... A change occurred in his ideology.

The Lotus Protocol was one of those papers that seems predicated on a set of procedures not mentioned. As I cannot independently confirm the existence of the group that he is allegedly working with, I cannot say for certain that such a set of protocols exists. However, if he does, it seems reasonable that we are dealing with what I have heard called upper-user reports. I am confused where StarFlower begins and Lotus ends?

In the Lotus Protocol, he set out to establish a longitudinal study to test the serial endosymbiotic theory of eukaryote cell origins.

BJ WOLF: George, you mentioned a change of ideology that took place with Dan back in 1987 or so. That was when he was working on something about cells in brackish water.....

It appears from his reports that soon after, a series of events began taking place at his research site, that swayed the procedures toward...well hold on just a second...

When I knew him, we were both graduate students taking what amounted to a structural biology course. He shared very little with me about his research intentions at that time. I will leave the institution out of this, but safe to say we were both trying to get the attention of the prof, I'll put him to his initials WL, and roomed near each other in the Schomburg area. We (or at least I) were more concerned with getting ahead...

He seemed to have the golden spoon with all those people following him around."

George explains that the people following Dan around were not "groupies" as Bj suggsts but "suits" and at least one naval person.

"Wherever he went they weren't far behind. He came and went from the campus so much it was somewhat hard to get to know him."

Well, I have concern about the issue of controls (or the lack thereof) being employed in this project, just from what I have read, but if the Ganesh Particle is confirmed, which seems likely given the images on your site, then the rest of the implications seem likely as well. Among those implications is the reason why controls aren't appropriate at this stage. He states in his over-verbose style, that the particles and so called cross bridges are very delicate, and that this entire phenomenon is unique to the biological sciences.

What control would a person use?

If the thing behaved as we expect biological systems to behave, then employ the formal experimental methods and use controls. This design appears to be quasi-scientific, on the surface, but I am not sure what else is being done in other reports and in other venues.

George tried to replicate the experiments and did manage to create Ganesh Particles but they dissipated once he tried to filter them.

George says that Dan was one of the most difficult people to get along with but he was a "straight shot" -"a pain but real smart."

Biologist X: Since I am telling it straight at you I will say this: Although I don't know personally what he was really involved with, he was the most likely to be involved with something this strange. He had a cockeyed way of looking at things (I hate this! I don't know whether to use present or past tense!!!) and that way usually penetrated deeper than others. Where it penetrated to is the worry.

 


You are in "interview room:1" ( Welcome to My Room )

xxxxxxx joined the room

BJ WOLF: Hello.

Biologist X: Hello, Ms. BJ?

BJ WOLF: Yes. Is this George?

Biologist X: Yes.

BJ WOLF: I was hoping to have someone else in on our interview, but I can't find them online.

Biologist X: You sure host one bopping room.

Biologist X: [a smiley face was inserted here]

BJ WOLF: Hey, I try...... no dancing on the tables is allowed, though.

Biologist X: I understand you wanted to have another person present, but you have to understand that my personal information, of which you mostly all know, must be kept away from this. I have a life.

Biologist X: Would you like to call me back? To try to get the other person.

BJ WOLF: I understand that. I protect my sources. let me try to get him. We can talk in the mean time if you'd like.

Biologist X: I have 12:05am so it should be 9pm there where he is.

Biologist X: This will be the Bill you spoke about, right?

BJ WOLF: Yea, that's what I have too. Yes. Bill has been very active in trying to get to the truth about Dan's situation, the research and all that stuff.

Biologist X: Okay, well I know about the case but am not much of a ufo follower. I am afraid that my comments could only assist concerning some of his background and perhaps some interpretation into hsi work.

Biologist X: Someone moved the "s" and "i" keys on my keyboard! "hsi"

BJ WOLF: That would be really helpful. Stand by a second. I want to invite him again. He sent me an email that he is online.

Biologist X: Fine.

BILL HAMILTON joined the room

BJ WOLF: Hi Bill. I'm glad you could make it.

BJ WOLF: The snow is falling like crazy up here.

BILL HAMILTON: It will be 80 deg here tomorrow

BJ WOLF: Oh yea, rub it in!!!

BJ WOLF: I'd like to introduce you to George.

BILL HAMILTON: Oh No, not Knapp?

Biologist X: I take it that you don't like the cold, BJ. Hello, Bill.

BILL HAMILTON: Hellop

BJ WOLF: No I really hate it.

Biologist X: Knapp? No. He is busy chasing lasers, or is that Lazars?

BILL HAMILTON: Right, like your humor

Biologist X: I was inited by BJ here to try to come to some sense of the work.

Biologist X: damned keyboard.

BJ WOLF: your letters jumping around on the keypad?

BILL HAMILTON: go ahead

Biologist X: Yes, it's gremlins.

BJ WOLF: I was hoping that we could talk a little about Dr. Burisch and

Biologist X: Well, that's interesting. Aah, what might we be having trouble with?

BJ WOLF: the Ganesh particles.

Biologist X: He's a maverick, but makes sense.

BJ WOLF: Well, not everybody agrees about the second part of that. There are a lot of people who just don't

BJ WOLF: understand what its all about.

BJ WOLF: Bill, I think you tried to explain it to someone recently, and it was very difficult.

Biologist X: Okay, I have been provided with a copy of the so called Lotus Protocol and the 18 page document posted on BJ's site. I have some concerns about the protocols employed, but not because

BILL HAMILTON: I just used Dan's words. Made sense to me.

BJ WOLF: I know. I think I have a pretty good grasp of it too. But it's not easy to explain what he is going after with these experiments.

Biologist X: they appear wacked out, but because there appears to be multiple levels of protocols being employed simultaneously.

BJ WOLF: What do you mean?

Biologist X: Throughout the work, this guy alludes to other forms and "pursuant to other protocols." I think we are dealing

Biologist X: with paperwork that was never meant to hit the light of day. Certainly

Biologist X: no self respecting peer-reviewed journal would publish it, under current guidelines.

Biologist X: This doesn't mean that it doesn't make sense though, although I wish it made a little less sense as it is giving me some problems with cell origins theory.

BJ WOLF: It seems to run afoul of current evolutionary theory.

BILL HAMILTON: There seems to be controversy about cell origins anyway.

Biologist X: His work appears to bear multiple logic levels and interdisciplinary ability on the level I figured he was bound, all those years ago.

BJ WOLF: How many years ago are we talking about here.

BILL HAMILTON: I was recently taught the endosymbiosis theory of eukaryotes

Biologist X: Well, not if you take his theory into account. And I must say that...1987-1989 (end of year). Yes, that figures into this prominently, but a change occurred in his ideology.

BILL HAMILTON: I have been told that he has completed his task that was due March 15th on Project Starflower

Biologist X: The Lotus Protocol was one of those papers that seems predicated on a set of procedures not mentioned. As I cannot independently confirm the existence of the group that he is allegedly working with, I cannot say for certain that such a set

Biologist X: of protocols exists. However, if he does, it seems reasonable that we are dealing with what I have heard called upper-user reports. I am confused where StarFlower begins and Lotus ends?

Biologist X: Is he tired of me?

Biologist X: Hello?

BJ WOLF: I've got no idea what happened. I will try to get him back in. He might have lost his connection completely.

BJ WOLF: Give me a second. OK

Biologist X: I will continue with the protocol issues. So he can read them, okay?

BJ WOLF: Ok. I will try periodically as we talk.

BJ WOLF: Where were we?

Biologist X: In the Lotus Protocol, he set out to establish a longitudinal study to test the serial endosymbiotic theory of eukaryote cell origins.

BJ WOLF: George, you mentioned a change of ideology that took place with Dan back in 1987 or so. That was when he was working on something about cells in brackish water.....

Biologist X: It appears from his reports that soon after, a series of events began taking place at his research site, that swayed the procedures toward...well hold on just a second...

Biologist X: When I knew him, we were both graduate students taking what amounted to a structural biology course. He shared very little with me about his research intentions at that time. I will leave the institution out of this, but safe to say we

Biologist X: were both trying to get the attention of the prof, I'll put him to his initials WL, and roomed near each other in the Schomburg area. We (or at least I) were more concerned with getting ahead

Biologist X: He seemed to have the golden spoon with all those people following him around.

Biologist X: Is the gentlemen coming back?

BJ WOLF: People following him around? Groupies?

Biologist X: Not groupies, suits.

BJ WOLF: Oh.

Biologist X: I also saw him with one naval person.

BJ WOLF: Hm, that would certainly tie in with some of the stuff I have been shown over the years.

Biologist X: Whereever he went they weren't far behind. He came and went from the campus so much it was somewhat hard to get to know him.

BJ WOLF: So he didn't reside there like everybody else did?

Biologist X: Any luck with Bill?

Biologist X: He stayed in the apartments, but left very often.

BJ WOLF: No. nothing. I get the feeling he was knocked offline.

Biologist X: He told me then that he was flying back and forth to Las Vegas.

BJ WOLF: I have tried twice to invite him back, and sent him an email.

Biologist X: Did I bore him or upset him?

BJ WOLF: The timing would would be about right. I know the institution you're not mentioning by name, and at that time I think he was working in Vegas.

BJ WOLF: No, nothing like that. I really think he lost his connection.

BJ WOLF: I just got an email from Bill

BJ WOLF: he said he got knocked off line and has not been able to get back into the chatroom

BJ WOLF: He has asked me to give him a summary tomorrow.

Biologist X: Okay. He more popped in to classes than spent time there, but all the quiet word was that he was doing everything everyone else was. Couldn't figure it then, still can't, unless I opt for the conspiracy theory.

Biologist X: Can you try to reattach him?

Biologist X: Print what we have and do another room?

BJ WOLF: I'll try again. Still no luck.

BJ WOLF: Sorry, he's logged off for the night.

Biologist X: I am sorry for that. Shall we continue?

BJ WOLF: We might as well. I'll print it out for him tomorrow.

Biologist X: You know I can't make a habit of this.

BJ WOLF: Yes. I am really grateful for you talking with me.

Biologist X: I was hoping to speak with him since he's one of the lead people looking into the protocol.

Biologist X: Where shall we go?

BJ WOLF: Yes. What would you tell him if he were still online.

Biologist X: Well, I have concern about the issue of controls (or the lack thereof) being employed in this project, just from what I have read, but

Biologist X: if the Ganesh Particle is confirmed, which seems likely given the images on your site, then the rest of the implications seem likely as well. Among those implications is

Biologist X: the reason why controls aren't appropriate at this stage. He states in his over-verbose style, that the particles and so called cross bridges are very delicate, and that this entire phenomenon is unique to the biological sciences.

BJ WOLF: I think that practically everybody I end up talking to knows more about biology than I do. I took the photos off the videotape, but I can't interpret them worth a damn. I don't even know why they look like they do. I have some photos of crossbridges

Biologist X: What control would a person use?

BJ WOLF: too, but I don't exactly know how to describe what is on the screen.

Biologist X: Hold on for a moment, I will return shortly.

BJ WOLF: Controls, for a particle with totally unknown and unexpected

BJ WOLF: properties. How do you design an experimental protocol much less anticipate it's behavior in order to

BJ WOLF: design controls?

Biologist X: If the thing behaved as we expect biological systems to behave, then employ the formal experimental methods and use controls. This design, appears to be quasi-scientific, on the surface, but I am not sure what else is being done in other reports and in other venues.

BJ WOLF: The cross bridges are supposed to be really fragile too. So fragile that they just break apart if the experiment is jarred. But even so, they manage to repair damaged cells nearby, and even masquerade as other cells enroute to the target cells. How does anyone design controls for something like that?

Biologist X: I understand, from the reports, that the process works like this:

Biologist X: 1. A minute electrical charge is applied to quartz, the form exactly I do not know.

Biologist X: 2. An electromagnetic opening is engendered to the crystal forms, resulting in an opening to whereever else.

Biologist X: 4. These branches find a particular cell, for whatever reason.

Biologist X: 5. This event is followed by the exit of a larger electromagnetic particle from the same opening.

Biologist X: 6. The larger particle is what he called the ganesh particle.

Biologist X: 7. The ganesh particle follows one of the paths of the river to a particular cell.

Biologist X: 8. During its "swim" to the cell, the ganesh particle undergoes some kind of maturing process.

Biologist X: 9. During that maturing process, the ganesh particle's volume increases from approximately 0.5micro.m. to 5.0micro.m.. His report stated that

Biologist X: Are you following me?

BJ WOLF: Yes. I am just staying quiet until you are done.

Biologist X: The sizes are diameters, 0.5 and 5.0. I should have stated that.

Biologist X: 10. This entire maturing process takes about 27 minutes.

BJ WOLF: I have a question

BJ WOLF: From your interpretation of the material, do you see the Ganesh particle as moving through these crossbridges like a subway train in a tunnle, and growing bigger as it goes.

BJ WOLF: Or does the Ganesh particle become a crossbridge?

Biologist X: No. I am getting there, for give me, I am older and slower. 11. Once the matured particle arrives at the cell, it attaches to it, but not before deploying some kind of device that comes from an operculum,

Biologist X: a flower-like opening. A tube-like structure is deployed as the particle comes to rest on the cell wall of the algae strand.

Biologist X: 12. This device bores into the algae strand.

Biologist X: 13. The particle then cements itself to the cell wall, all the while the drilling device is headed for a nucleus.

Biologist X: 14. At the same time (or closely thereafter) the drilling device hits the nucleus, the particle begins changing.

Biologist X: 15. The single particle, like a seed, begins to germinate.

Biologist X: Now is where my interp gets difficult.

BJ WOLF: OK.

Biologist X: 16. Multiple cell forms appear, but only of two types: (1) true eukaryote-like cells that form the cross bridges parenchyma (of which there are subtypes--- those stopped at varying stages of the cell cycle) and (2) support cells that look like semi-rigid balloons.

Biologist X: 17. So the particle is no more, but now we have cells. The last image in your site's presentation

BJ WOLF: That helps me make some sense of it. Those last images were so different from the first ones I was really confused. But there they were on the videotape.

Biologist X: shows what appears to be segregation, almost like a pseudo-tissue.

BJ WOLF: Yes. It looked heavily textured, and seemed to have internal structures

Biologist X: The drilling device (called by him the Shiva Linga) appears defined thoughout this growing mass of cells, somewhat like (and I hate to use this analogy) the snake used to open a toilet drain.

BJ WOLF: Oh that's vivid

BJ WOLF: What's it's drilling for?

Biologist X: The drill is on the front, in this case, and it has multiple branches that tun backward through the cross bridge cells 'parenchyma'.

Biologist X: I'll get there.

BJ WOLF: Sorry...

Biologist X: 18. Once the cross bridge is large, full of cells, and extended (with the support cells), the drilling device finds its way (and I am not sure of the growth dynamics) to the open end of the cross bridge. The drilling device then attaches the open end of the crossbridge to another algae strand.

Biologist X: 19. He theorized that both cells needed help, that they had occurred to them some kind of environmental damage, and that this would ameliorate the damage. This was done as he said he evidenced the cells recuperation. (if that is an appropriate term??) He also theorized that the cells which were stopped at various

Biologist X: stages in their cycles acted as a library for the damaged cells to recognize (biochemically) what would be necessary to repair themselves, and that perhaps the cross bridge cells added the right biochemical components to facilitate that help.

Biologist X: 20. After the cross bridge did its job, it became weak and died off.

Biologist X: This is what I have pieced together from his reports.

BJ WOLF: That's quite an assessment.

Biologist X: Not really. I just followed his report and jotted down the salient directions.

BJ WOLF: I have not been able to follow your explanation completely, but that's no surprise since my academic background is not science.

Biologist X: What is the problem? Let's clear it here because, as you say, many have had a problem with this, and I am trying to help.

BJ WOLF: Do the crossbridge cells - are they generated from the Ganesh particle? Do they just appear out of nowhere?

Biologist X: It appears he is saying that the Ganesh particle is a seed, that germinates, and forms the cells of the cross bridges.

BJ WOLF: He told me, once, some time ago that he thought the crossbridge cells were like a tubular combination lock.

Biologist X: Is there a preexisting cell in the particle, I can't say from his research.

Biologist X: He may have been referring to the drilling device, and its tube that extends through the cross bridge.

Biologist X: His dissertation on the Shiva Linga as he calls it, goes that way.

BJ WOLF: Possibly. So that tube isn't a crossbridge. It's inside a crossbridge? Also, you indicated that there were cells that had been stopped at various stages n their cycles. Were these also ganesh particles or algae, or something else.

BJ WOLF: Also, can this miraculous ballet take place in any kind of environment? Does the environment have to be fluid?

Biologist X: As his writing goes, the cells that are stopped at various stages are the cross bridge cells that had been germinated from the ganesh particle. The tube, having come out of the ganesh particle befaore it germinated into many cells, winds its way through and between cross bridge cells, when the cross bridge is mature and attached to a second alage strand.

Biologist X: damned keyboard.

BJ WOLF: I am probably being unfair to you, since you are just interpreting his writings.

Biologist X: I am doing my best. You know I tried to replicate the Ganesh particles?

BJ WOLF: You did?

BJ WOLF: Any luck?

Biologist X: Yes. You wanna know what I got?

BJ WOLF: sure.....

Biologist X: Ganesh Particles.

Biologist X: They dissipated once I tried to filter them.

Biologist X: Then I tried using SEM.

Biologist X: No good.

BJ WOLF: Are you kidding? so the experiment can yield results for pretty much anybody who tries to reproduce the results? Presuming, of course they know what they are doing.

BJ WOLF: Why didn't the SEM work?

Biologist X: It seems that way. I have ceased the replication attempts though.

BJ WOLF: It seems to be a better way than light microscopes, given how small these things are.

Biologist X: The vacuum is a possibility. Or maybe the bombardment. They never formed as best I could tell. I ahve decided

Biologist X: damned keyboard...or is it my fingers?

Biologist X: to stop out of concern for their potential.

BJ WOLF: I am making alot of type0s today too. Why do you think 'they' are pressuring Dan into working so hard on this Ganesh stuff?

Biologist X: I am trying to find them in a natural setting.

BJ WOLF: I know you sort of laughed off the 'conspiracy' aspect to this, but you saw them following him at university. the "not" groupies.

Biologist X: I can't say. I don't know. His warnings about what he calls the "conjoined Lotus" is of special concern. The headlines are everywhere about

Biologist X: putting together artificial organisms. The implications for grabbing this and harnessing it are frightening at best.

Biologist X: The talk about a prototype is interesti in a frightening way.

Biologist X: Now that what the damned keyboard!

BJ WOLF: You know, I don't mean to be flippant, but I can see people trying to do this themselves. With no training or skill sets in biology. Just hooking up a battery to some crystal, and hoping for a miracle.

Biologist X: They do that anyway.

Biologist X: If he is right, this is going on all around us. Unseen by our eyes, unknown to our senses.

BJ WOLF: And all those people at Caltech looking for data on the Ganesh particle - you mean, it's been there all along?

Biologist X: The only evidence I have is scattered and mostly from your site. According to what he wrote, yes.

Biologist X: Caltech?

BJ WOLF: I am trying my best to get as much out to the public as I can. Yes, the figures for October

BJ WOLF: in the top 10 of Electronic Thesis and Dissertation archive online searches put the ganesh particle at #8.

BJ WOLF: Don't they have something to do with JPL?

Biologist X: Some student still have open minds. But you know the reality is that if my name gets out to the public my career is shattered. Forgive the expression but just talking with you folks like this is enough to end my job.

Biologist X: damned keyboard.

Biologist X: Caltech is the host for JPL I believe.

BJ WOLF: I know you are taking an awful risk talking to me.

Biologist X: Oh, it just hit me, JPL and Mars.

BJ WOLF: Yes. there is quite a connection brewing.

Biologist X: Have I been of help to you this evening?

BJ WOLF: Yes, very much. I know you can't talk too much longer.

Biologist X: No I can't. I am sorry for Bill missing the interplay.

BJ WOLF: Me too. He would have added a lot to the discussion. I will get this over to him first thing tomorrow.

Biologist X: Let me ask you something- do you think he is dead?

BJ WOLF: Honestly, I did up until a little while ago. I thought all those people who were so optimistic were

BJ WOLF: just engaging in wishfull thinking. But some things have happened lately that make me wonder. So, I just don't know anymore.

Biologist X: May I ask what things? I do so hope for him.

BJ WOLF: I wish I could say, but I don't want to take the chance right now.

BJ WOLF: I am hopeful though.

Biologist X: I respect that. Can I ask what was this thing about Geroge Knapp at the beginning? You said he had some dealings with him in the past...

Biologist X: that time it was me not the keyboard.

BJ WOLF: Yes, when I first got to know Dan he told me some horrendous stories about George Knapp hounding him, trying to get him to talk about his associations with the military or government. George was always trying to dig up information about Area-51 and saw Dan as his ticket to fame in that regard.

Biologist X: I thought he had the Lazar case?

BJ WOLF: Anyway, things got really heated, and George backed off. He seemed to back completely away from anything to do with the Area.

BJ WOLF: Yes, he was instrumental in the Lasar Case. In fact,

BJ WOLF: I had a meeting with John Lear a few months ago

Biologist X: THE John Lear?

BJ WOLF: and that was where George set up the cameras when he organized the meeting and interviews

BJ WOLF: yes, The John Lear. Bill introduced us. We sat in John's study at his home up on the slope of Sunrise Mtn in Las Vegas

BJ WOLF: and talked for quite a while.

Biologist X: Why did Bill say, Oh, No, not George Knapp? Has he been hounding him too?

BJ WOLF: Bill has every reason to be leary of talking to George Knapp, Just from my own experiences with the guy I don't think he ever had an open mind about the situation Dan was going through.

BJ WOLF: I talked to George Knapp at least twice in person in Vegas. We talked for about an hour each time, concerning Dan. And each time I got the feeling that he had already made up his mind before I ever started talking to him. I felt like I was wasting my time.

Biologist X: Why not, although he was one of the most difficult people in the whole world to get along with, he was (and I hope IS) a straight shot.

BJ WOLF: That's it exactly! Nobody knows how to deal with a person like that.

Biologist X: I mean this guy is a real pain.

Biologist X: Smart though.

BJ WOLF: Ok, now I believe you - you really did know Dan personally!

Biologist X: Yup I do!

Biologist X: One thought equals six ideas with him!

Biologist X: Since I am telling it straight at you I will say this:

BJ WOLF: Yes. He's almost impossible for people to talk to without tearing out their hair at some point or another.

Biologist X: and I have to sign off after this...

BJ WOLF: Ok, go ahead.

Biologist X: Although I don't know personally what he was really involved with, he was the most likely to be involved with something this strange. He had a cockeyed way of looking at things (I hate this! I don't know whether to use present

Biologist X: or past tense!!!).

Biologist X: and that way usually penetrated deeper than others. Where is penetrated to is the worry.

Biologist X: I really have to go.

BJ WOLF: I understand.

Biologist X: Good night.

Biologist X: [smiley was inserted here]

BJ WOLF: Thank you for taking the time to talk. Take care.

xxxxxxx left the room